|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
141
   |
Posted - 2012.03.21 10:49:00 -
[1] - Quote
Tikktokk Tokkzikk wrote:If it is an exploit, we're just one step closer to WOW in space.
I really hope CCP change their cearbear direction. If not, I'll have to re-think my yearly subscription.
Yes. Evading CONCORD has never been an exploit. I too will rage and act surprised when CCP deems this an exploit. |
MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
141
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 11:09:00 -
[2] - Quote
Buck Futz wrote:MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:Tikktokk Tokkzikk wrote:If it is an exploit, we're just one step closer to WOW in space.
I really hope CCP change their cearbear direction. If not, I'll have to re-think my yearly subscription. Yes. Evading CONCORD has never been an exploit. I too will rage and act surprised when CCP deems this an exploit. Because you seem a bit slow: Gank, ship no go boom = Concord evasion Gank, warp away, but ship still get caught and go boom <> Concord evasion.
Because you seem a bit daft:
Gank, warp away, gank, warp away, gank, warp away = CONCORD evasion.
Hell, you could let GCC count down without ever getting caught. But sure, we can both act surprised when we find out together that evading CONCORD is considered exploit for the very first time in Eve's history. |
MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
143
|
Posted - 2012.03.22 11:07:00 -
[3] - Quote
Tallian Saotome wrote:If the bother fitting a point to keep you pinned long enough to be concorded.
This is reasonable. Could you post your complete pod fit?
|
MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
143
|
Posted - 2012.03.22 22:03:00 -
[4] - Quote
Tallian Saotome wrote:
However, evading concord for a short time is not an exploit.
Is this known to be true?
If so, what is considered a "short time"? |
MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
143
|
Posted - 2012.03.22 22:19:00 -
[5] - Quote
That's still open to interpretation, since a GCC can be increased by simply committing another crime. So "short time" could mean 15 minutes, 30 minutes, an hour, or longer even. Or it could mean five minutes. Or, evading Concord at any time after committing a crime could be considered an exploit.
|
MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
143
|
Posted - 2012.03.22 23:17:00 -
[6] - Quote
Tallian Saotome wrote:CCPs new carebear friendly stance may have changed this, which is why I am slightly non-committal on it
Interesting way to look at it, considering that the ones that have changed the rule (as you view it) are the hi sec gankers extending their own GCC (and Concord destruction times) by using the boomerang technique. Seems they can go on indefinitely with this technique.
They (hi sec suicide gankers) can keep Concord chasing them by extending the GCC. If the rule was as you say then it is not carebears that have changed it. |
MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
224
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 00:00:00 -
[7] - Quote
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:Tikktokk Tokkzikk wrote:If it is an exploit, we're just one step closer to WOW in space.
I really hope CCP change their cearbear direction. If not, I'll have to re-think my yearly subscription. Yes. Evading CONCORD has never been an exploit. I too will rage and act surprised when CCP deems this an exploit.
I am now acting surprised and furiously raging that, for the very first time CCP has declared evading Concord is an exploit!
Shall we meet at the JIta statue, say, at 11 tonight? |
MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
236
|
Posted - 2012.04.01 13:38:00 -
[8] - Quote
"Evading Concord isn't really evading Concord as long as you eventually stop evading Concord".
True story. |
|
|
| |
|